The Law Clerk Writes…. Consumer Rights Act 2015
The Law Clerk Writes…. “With my law degree out of the way, I do some work as a Litigation Assistant and I am also involved in my own long running Small Claims case. The Law fascinates me and it concerns me how disconnected most people are from it so part of my goal is to try and explain how it works to ‘ordinary’ people like online sellers”.
Today the Law Clerk looks at the Consumer Rights Act 2015:
The Consumer Rights Act 2015
English Law is primarily incremental and The Consumer Rights Act 2015 is a good example.
While it is a ‘new’ Act of Parliament, quite a bit of the content is not new so the Act is more of a consolidation and much that went before still holds true.
Also as before, people will not appreciate the definitions of ‘consumer’ and ‘trader’.
If I, as a business in construction, buy tea bags for the office, even if in the company name, I am a consumer as I am “acting for purposes that are wholly or mainly outside that individual’s trade” as I am not in the tea or tea bag trade.
If I buy those tea bags from online seller TeaBagCity who have been trading in tea bags for years, then they are a trader regardless of whether they are a business, a student, a granny working from home or whatever as they are “a person acting for purposes relating to that person’s trade”.
And what if both parties are consumers or both are traders (if that is even possible now)?
This new Act only applies to contracts (written or otherwise) for supply by a trader to a consumer and otherwise it is back to the Sale of Goods Act 1979.
Until some claims percolate to the appeal level, we are unlikely to get any reported cases which might clarify the court’s thinking on all this.
What, for example, will they make of the use of the word ‘person’ in the definition of trader but ‘individual’ in the definition of consumer? What is the difference?