Glyding into easier media sales
17/11/2009 at 00:17
A new media marketplace site launches in the US today which aims to reach those sellers put off by the complexity of selling on eBay or Amazon. Sellers on Glyde.com can list books, CDs, DVDs and video games in just a few seconds by matching their item with a huge database of media items. Once their item has found a buyer, Glyde send the seller a pre-stamped mailer to ship the item to the buyer: all the seller has to do is drop it in the post. There is no fee to list; once the item is sold, Glyde take 10% of the purchase price plus the cost of the mailer ($1.00 – $1.75, depending on the item).
It’s a pretty attractive-sounding process for private sellers who need to get rid of their unwanted items, but can’t be bothered with the eBay process of photographing them and crafting descriptions – or even with the Amazon process of having to find a jiffy bag! But Glyde’s real innovation is in how the site looks to buyers. Buyers see only one listing for each product. They never learn the identity of the seller; there is no feedback to assess or to leave. When a buyer purchases an item, Glyde itself decides who gets that order based on calculations of best price and quickest shipping time, plus a seller’s previous reliability.
Buyers have complete peace of mind with an overt returns policy (you have 48 hours to change your mind) and transaction policies that spell out exactly what will happen in case of loss, item not as described or counterfeit. Buyers pay Glyde, and sellers don’t receive their cash until the buyer is happy: that way, they say, it’s much harder for anyone to game the system.
The one issue I do have with the site is that it only seems to let me buy one item at a time: that would get annoying quickly, and discourage me from buying multiple items. If I were in charge of Glyde, I’d have everything listed postage-inclusive (no complaints about combined shipping that way), and allow a multi-item checkout; I think that would boost sales quite considerably. But Glyde’s founder is eBay Motors’ founder Simon Rothman, so you’d think he knows what he’s doing.
So the million dollar question: could Glyde threaten eBay? In their very narrowly-defined target market, I think the answer has to be yes. They look to have overcome most of the problems associated with eBay right from the start. For sellers, everything is simple, clear and fast: items can be listed in a few clicks and the steep learning curve associated with selling on eBay or Amazon just isn’t there. For buyers, because Glyde are owning the transactions themselves, there’s more security right from the beginning; customer service and returns polices are set out clearly and are uniform across the site. Granted, the uber-controlled process probably won’t appeal to sellers running their own sales’ empires, but that’s not who Glyde is aiming at: the target market is sellers who can’t be bothered with more complex ecommerce: “We want the middle-aged Midwestern soccer mom to easily be able to buy and sell her stuff,” says Rothman.
US media sellers (Randy?), what do you think? Does that “one at a time” style of selling put you off, or will you be listing items on Glyde? US buyers, does it look good or will you be sticking with eBay, Amazon and the hundreds of other media sites out there? And sellers everywhere else – is this the sort of marketplace you’d list on? Leave us a comment.






Chris Dawson says
1:16 am on 17/11/2009
So Mr Rothman, one question – when is Glyde.co.uk opening up shop instead of redirecting to glyde.com?
Sue Bailey says
1:17 am on November 17th, 2009
Ahh, good spot! Think the same idea would work beautifully in the UK.
whirly says
10:51 am on 17/11/2009
Looks good to me. I had a look at a PS3 game, offered ‘new’ or ‘excellent’ total all shown clearly.
I would certainly try it.
Chris Dawson says
11:36 am on 17/11/2009
What’s REALLY interesting is when you list and select a price they tell you how likely your item is to sell.
I had a go at a book and at $2.00 I was 43rd in the queue. Dropping the price to $1.75 I was “next to sell”. Cute!
whirly says
11:43 am on 17/11/2009
Well I am not sure about your maths
but it certainly looks a neat idea.
One of the reasons I have about 400 DVD’s in the garage is simply because I can’t be arsed to put them on eBay or amazon. I watch them once after buying them from asda or whatever and never look at them again. Probably a few hundred quids worth just sat there.
Chris Dawson says
3:11 pm on November 17th, 2009
My maths is good, my typing is not so good, but luckily I can edit comments so it’s correct now
radams says
11:46 am on 17/11/2009
‘Buyers pay Glyde, and sellers don’t receive their cash until the buyer is happy: that way, they say, it’s much harder for anyone to game the system.’
Looks pretty easy for the buyer to ‘game’ the system to me!
Debs says
7:31 pm on November 17th, 2009
That comment raised my eyebrows, too!
ebuyerfb says
2:35 pm on 17/11/2009
Sounds interesting. The part that would concern me is the shipping time though. The seller can’t ship until that mailer arrives. In the US you can expect that to take 3 days and if it is right after Thanksgiving, around 2 – 3 weeks.
And what if the mailer is never received by the seller? It looks like Glyde still gets their mailer fee yet they expect buyer and seller to share the loss when the seller fails to deliver. What if the mailer isn’t adequate packaging and the DVD breaks?
This part is also interesting:
A loophole would be to own a counterfeit product, buy legit product on Glyde, complain to Glyde its counterfeit, send counterfeit to Glyde, and ruin seller’s life. The only protection the sellers have from this is they are anonymous meaning they can’t be specifically targeted.
ebuyerfb says
2:42 pm on 17/11/2009
Something that would be really nice is if Glyde could work in the reverse as well. Half.com has a feature where you enter a price you are willing to pay as a buyer and when sellers post their item they are notified they can make an immediate sale at that price.
Alister says
7:38 am on 19/11/2009
I wonder how they get that “likely to sell or not” rating. That is a bit of new technology I haven’t seen used before, do you think its based on visitor trends of supply and demand over a period of time?