<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So farewell then, 100% feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html</link>
	<description>eBay &#38; ecommerce made easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MORAL</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34937</link>
		<dc:creator>MORAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34937</guid>
		<description>I am both a PS and a frquent buyer, so I think I know the pyschological working on both sides. In my mind, the eBay market place before any changes is not perfect, but I cannot see how the changes will make the better with out any very negative impacts:

Re Selling: There has been market research into feeback % ratings and that is still the PRIMARY benchmark buyers look at. When buyers need to evaluate hundreds of items all with the same name and image the difference comes down to the percentage, which is a fast means of evaluation without digging into the histories which as a buyer can be very time consuming. Let&#039;s face it, no one digs into histories buying a pair of 99p AA batteries. However if the deal turns nasty you know what will happen under the new policies. On the other hand, like any community, an offence in my opinion, regardles of how long ago it took place, should be recorded and refelcted to the community. I believe in repent, but let what s/he does afterwards do the justice, NOT time! Will you not be a bit more wary with a 20-year old ex-paedophile, now seemingly kind 60-year-old, sits your daughter? I also see the trend of rogue sellerrs having tens of accounts, leaving badly scored accounts to &#039;cool-off&#039; during the 12 months while operating others, and reoperate the accounts in 12 months, vice versa. Buyers will ahve absolutely no idea that they are dealing 100% +ve rogue sellers, nothwithstanding there are limited monitoring by eBay which I know is very unreliable.

Re buying: With the already-meaningless buyer account, where each can be set up in 5 mins without ANY identification in many eBay sites depending on countires, the new policies mean that there will be more rogue buyers using these new &#039;0&#039; feedback accounts as &#039;Kamikaze accounts&#039;, leaving bad comments and -ves for sellers they want to get rid of for their revenge on a deal they were not ahppy about. It is suicidal, the account gets suspended who cares - another will be up and running in 5 mins. Yes Sellers can limit buyers, but where does it stop..? Limitation can affect turnover drastically. Moreover, a high feedback buyer can have an army of rogue buyer accounts behind him. He does not need to temper with his &#039;polished&#039; account. So all PSs, I guess you can see the total collapse of the feedback system, can you not?

Sorry to sound pessimistic and evil, but I think know eBay long anough as a PS... Let alone those who is sceptical about all these possibilities these are happening every second on eBay. All I can say is, I think eBay is trying to fix something that is not broken... more blatantly, I think it is more of a resouce decision in eBay. Do you not notice that many decisions can reduce human input in those departments, namely dispute reslutions, which is extremely costly and time consuming.

Good Luck all eBayer, buying or selling, just be vigilent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am both a PS and a frquent buyer, so I think I know the pyschological working on both sides. In my mind, the eBay market place before any changes is not perfect, but I cannot see how the changes will make the better with out any very negative impacts:</p>
<p>Re Selling: There has been market research into feeback % ratings and that is still the PRIMARY benchmark buyers look at. When buyers need to evaluate hundreds of items all with the same name and image the difference comes down to the percentage, which is a fast means of evaluation without digging into the histories which as a buyer can be very time consuming. Let&#8217;s face it, no one digs into histories buying a pair of 99p AA batteries. However if the deal turns nasty you know what will happen under the new policies. On the other hand, like any community, an offence in my opinion, regardles of how long ago it took place, should be recorded and refelcted to the community. I believe in repent, but let what s/he does afterwards do the justice, NOT time! Will you not be a bit more wary with a 20-year old ex-paedophile, now seemingly kind 60-year-old, sits your daughter? I also see the trend of rogue sellerrs having tens of accounts, leaving badly scored accounts to &#8216;cool-off&#8217; during the 12 months while operating others, and reoperate the accounts in 12 months, vice versa. Buyers will ahve absolutely no idea that they are dealing 100% +ve rogue sellers, nothwithstanding there are limited monitoring by eBay which I know is very unreliable.</p>
<p>Re buying: With the already-meaningless buyer account, where each can be set up in 5 mins without ANY identification in many eBay sites depending on countires, the new policies mean that there will be more rogue buyers using these new &#8216;0&#8242; feedback accounts as &#8216;Kamikaze accounts&#8217;, leaving bad comments and -ves for sellers they want to get rid of for their revenge on a deal they were not ahppy about. It is suicidal, the account gets suspended who cares &#8211; another will be up and running in 5 mins. Yes Sellers can limit buyers, but where does it stop..? Limitation can affect turnover drastically. Moreover, a high feedback buyer can have an army of rogue buyer accounts behind him. He does not need to temper with his &#8216;polished&#8217; account. So all PSs, I guess you can see the total collapse of the feedback system, can you not?</p>
<p>Sorry to sound pessimistic and evil, but I think know eBay long anough as a PS&#8230; Let alone those who is sceptical about all these possibilities these are happening every second on eBay. All I can say is, I think eBay is trying to fix something that is not broken&#8230; more blatantly, I think it is more of a resouce decision in eBay. Do you not notice that many decisions can reduce human input in those departments, namely dispute reslutions, which is extremely costly and time consuming.</p>
<p>Good Luck all eBayer, buying or selling, just be vigilent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: northumbrian</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34905</link>
		<dc:creator>northumbrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34905</guid>
		<description>I think many are missing the point here
 thesedays its not about how  high your  feedback  score is
 its how your buyers rate you over the last30/ 90days and your neutrals and negs over the last 12 months,
 bunging a few repeat feedbacks to your score from years ago is meaning less</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many are missing the point here<br />
 thesedays its not about how  high your  feedback  score is<br />
 its how your buyers rate you over the last30/ 90days and your neutrals and negs over the last 12 months,<br />
 bunging a few repeat feedbacks to your score from years ago is meaning less</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abs</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34897</link>
		<dc:creator>abs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 23:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34897</guid>
		<description>thanks sue. since the DSR ratings came into play, ive always addressed my neutrals. not because they where neutrals on my feedback profile, but more so that if the buyer left a neutral, they obviously left me low DSR too (if any). I dont know were i stand now tho with no MWF. im sure futher protections will come into play down the line! WELL I HOPE SO :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks sue. since the DSR ratings came into play, ive always addressed my neutrals. not because they where neutrals on my feedback profile, but more so that if the buyer left a neutral, they obviously left me low DSR too (if any). I dont know were i stand now tho with no MWF. im sure futher protections will come into play down the line! WELL I HOPE SO <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Bailey</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34896</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 23:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34896</guid>
		<description>Abs, when they introduced f/b percentages (2001 or 2002, I forget exactly), the outcry was JUST as bad as what we&#039;re hearing now. eBay didn&#039;t really justify or explain how they were making the calculation, or not the I remember reading. It all depends on how you&#039;re defining what you want; neutrals used to be considered pretty meaningless, but now they&#039;re trying to clean up the site a bit, they&#039;re taking them more seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abs, when they introduced f/b percentages (2001 or 2002, I forget exactly), the outcry was JUST as bad as what we&#8217;re hearing now. eBay didn&#8217;t really justify or explain how they were making the calculation, or not the I remember reading. It all depends on how you&#8217;re defining what you want; neutrals used to be considered pretty meaningless, but now they&#8217;re trying to clean up the site a bit, they&#8217;re taking them more seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abs</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34895</link>
		<dc:creator>abs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34895</guid>
		<description>Hi All,

Ok I maybe wrong here, if so can sue and chris and the other experienced ebayers correct me please.

My understanding is that eBay got the feedback % messed up back in the day. Wasnt it always meant to show only positive feedback % scores, but they let the neutrals slide. NO MORE THo.

So its simple, ur 99.5% feedback score etc, is your TRUE positive score!!! the remaining .5% is obviously the remaining that was not positive. Its not that the neutral is the new negative, its just that the correct formula has been put in place!!! because Neutral is NOT a positive, so why should that be included in your Positive Score.

Do i make sense here? Hope so???

I like the new changes!!!! happy buyers = $$$Â£Â£Â£$$$$ :razz:  :smile:  :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>Ok I maybe wrong here, if so can sue and chris and the other experienced ebayers correct me please.</p>
<p>My understanding is that eBay got the feedback % messed up back in the day. Wasnt it always meant to show only positive feedback % scores, but they let the neutrals slide. NO MORE THo.</p>
<p>So its simple, ur 99.5% feedback score etc, is your TRUE positive score!!! the remaining .5% is obviously the remaining that was not positive. Its not that the neutral is the new negative, its just that the correct formula has been put in place!!! because Neutral is NOT a positive, so why should that be included in your Positive Score.</p>
<p>Do i make sense here? Hope so???</p>
<p>I like the new changes!!!! happy buyers = $$$Â£Â£Â£$$$$ <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':razz:' class='wp-smiley' />   <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' />   <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry007</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34870</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34870</guid>
		<description>Also,

Has anyone noticed the line of  &#039;historic feedback&#039; record has now Gone in memders feedback profile!!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also,</p>
<p>Has anyone noticed the line of  &#8216;historic feedback&#8217; record has now Gone in memders feedback profile!!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry007</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34860</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34860</guid>
		<description>Yesterday afternoon I was quite happy we the new feedback scores. Because of a couple pf problems our 2nd account score had 99.10% (after a few negociations in Mutual feedback withdrawal).
After the recalculations it rose to 99.60% which was a relief. At that time the 12months scores were;  P = 592  Nu = 6  Ne = 2. All Ok 
The drop down calucation said; P = 494  Nu = 6  Ne = 2. 
I did and do not understand the difference, but thought &#039;oh well best left alone&#039;.

TODAY, after receiving a POS overnight, the rating has crashed to 98.40% (from 99.60%). 98.40% is the rating that shows on listings, so unless I reading all this wrong I lost big time out of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday afternoon I was quite happy we the new feedback scores. Because of a couple pf problems our 2nd account score had 99.10% (after a few negociations in Mutual feedback withdrawal).<br />
After the recalculations it rose to 99.60% which was a relief. At that time the 12months scores were;  P = 592  Nu = 6  Ne = 2. All Ok<br />
The drop down calucation said; P = 494  Nu = 6  Ne = 2.<br />
I did and do not understand the difference, but thought &#8216;oh well best left alone&#8217;.</p>
<p>TODAY, after receiving a POS overnight, the rating has crashed to 98.40% (from 99.60%). 98.40% is the rating that shows on listings, so unless I reading all this wrong I lost big time out of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canvasrepublic</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34817</link>
		<dc:creator>canvasrepublic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34817</guid>
		<description>I quite like our new 100 percent rating and green star. Long may it continue!!!.  :grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite like our new 100 percent rating and green star. Long may it continue!!!.  <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34807</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34807</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the rant but it really gets my goat when people think that volume is the only thing that matters and denigrate those who don&#039;t sell in volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the rant but it really gets my goat when people think that volume is the only thing that matters and denigrate those who don&#8217;t sell in volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34806</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34806</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of the ones who trys to sell one or two high value items a month and if I could find a niche for something new that I could stick in a jiffy bag I&#039;d do it in a shot. It would make a change from heaving 400Kg machines about.

Nick, to say that I don&#039;t work hard is an insult. You have no idea how many emails &amp; phone calls I have to make to sell one of my items. Probably as many as you do to sell all yours.

You have no idea how hard it is to actually make the sale either.

I chose my market just the same as others did, and as far as I&#039;m concerned I pay my fees, I make the sales to be a Powerseller. When I don&#039;t make the sales I won&#039;t be one, but that won&#039;t be down to lack of work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of the ones who trys to sell one or two high value items a month and if I could find a niche for something new that I could stick in a jiffy bag I&#8217;d do it in a shot. It would make a change from heaving 400Kg machines about.</p>
<p>Nick, to say that I don&#8217;t work hard is an insult. You have no idea how many emails &amp; phone calls I have to make to sell one of my items. Probably as many as you do to sell all yours.</p>
<p>You have no idea how hard it is to actually make the sale either.</p>
<p>I chose my market just the same as others did, and as far as I&#8217;m concerned I pay my fees, I make the sales to be a Powerseller. When I don&#8217;t make the sales I won&#8217;t be one, but that won&#8217;t be down to lack of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry007</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34805</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34805</guid>
		<description>Sue, 
I too wondered what the calculations were in the drop down box, in &#039;what the scores means&#039;

I just looked at a couple of sellers that I still have in myebay, and am even more confused now.
I am pasting here the feedback no&#039;s &amp; the drop down boxes.
1.A/
Recent Feedback Ratings (last 12 months)  

  1 month 6 months 12 months  

 Positive  9 35 47 
 Neutral   0  0   0 
 Negative 0  0   1 

1B/
The Positive Feedback percentage is calculated based on the number of positive, negative and neutral ratings (including Repeat Feedback) received in the last 12 months as folows: 

 
Positives 
 
Positives + Neutrals + Negatives 

 
Member&#039;s 12 Month Feedback ratings 
Positives:44Neutrals:0Negatives: 0 

 
Member&#039;s Positive Feedback percentage 

 
44  = 100.0% 
 
44 + 0 + 0 
----------------------------------------------------------
2A/
Recent Feedback Ratings (last 12 months)  

  1 month 6 months 12 months  

 Positive 39 308 388 
 Neutral   0     2     4 
 Negative 2     5     5 

2B/
The Positive Feedback percentage is calculated based on the number of positive, negative and neutral ratings (including Repeat Feedback) received in the last 12 months as folows: 

Positives 
 
Positives + Neutrals + Negatives 

 
Member&#039;s 12 Month Feedback ratings 
Positives:373
Neutrals:4
Negatives: 4 

 
Member&#039;s Positive Feedback percentage 


373  = 97.9% 
----------------------------------------------------------
 
This is not the only example of the detailed ratings in the drop down box are different to the overall ratings.....
Am I going down the wrong road!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue,<br />
I too wondered what the calculations were in the drop down box, in &#8216;what the scores means&#8217;</p>
<p>I just looked at a couple of sellers that I still have in myebay, and am even more confused now.<br />
I am pasting here the feedback no&#8217;s &amp; the drop down boxes.<br />
1.A/<br />
Recent Feedback Ratings (last 12 months)  </p>
<p>  1 month 6 months 12 months  </p>
<p> Positive  9 35 47<br />
 Neutral   0  0   0<br />
 Negative 0  0   1 </p>
<p>1B/<br />
The Positive Feedback percentage is calculated based on the number of positive, negative and neutral ratings (including Repeat Feedback) received in the last 12 months as folows: </p>
<p>Positives </p>
<p>Positives + Neutrals + Negatives </p>
<p>Member&#8217;s 12 Month Feedback ratings<br />
Positives:44Neutrals:0Negatives: 0 </p>
<p>Member&#8217;s Positive Feedback percentage </p>
<p>44  = 100.0% </p>
<p>44 + 0 + 0<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
2A/<br />
Recent Feedback Ratings (last 12 months)  </p>
<p>  1 month 6 months 12 months  </p>
<p> Positive 39 308 388<br />
 Neutral   0     2     4<br />
 Negative 2     5     5 </p>
<p>2B/<br />
The Positive Feedback percentage is calculated based on the number of positive, negative and neutral ratings (including Repeat Feedback) received in the last 12 months as folows: </p>
<p>Positives </p>
<p>Positives + Neutrals + Negatives </p>
<p>Member&#8217;s 12 Month Feedback ratings<br />
Positives:373<br />
Neutrals:4<br />
Negatives: 4 </p>
<p>Member&#8217;s Positive Feedback percentage </p>
<p>373  = 97.9%<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>This is not the only example of the detailed ratings in the drop down box are different to the overall ratings&#8230;..<br />
Am I going down the wrong road!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Sam</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34796</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34796</guid>
		<description>Am pretty chuffed - we don&#039;t get a fraction of the negs we did a few years ago but still haven&#039;t been able to get our rating above 98.8%, so am rather pleased it&#039;s now gone up to 99.2%

Interestingly, one of my DSR&#039;s has improved on my personal account as well, despite my not having had any buyer Feedback for 10 days. I didn&#039;t think these changes would affect DSR&#039;s or perhaps it&#039;s a coincidence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am pretty chuffed &#8211; we don&#8217;t get a fraction of the negs we did a few years ago but still haven&#8217;t been able to get our rating above 98.8%, so am rather pleased it&#8217;s now gone up to 99.2%</p>
<p>Interestingly, one of my DSR&#8217;s has improved on my personal account as well, despite my not having had any buyer Feedback for 10 days. I didn&#8217;t think these changes would affect DSR&#8217;s or perhaps it&#8217;s a coincidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whirly</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34793</link>
		<dc:creator>whirly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34793</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be feeling it more than most Chris, low volume high value sales will be my downfall on eBay they don&#039;t want our money or our products it seems.

Thankfully eBay&#039;s biggest competitor in the UK market bit our hands off when we rang them so we now have a good spread of the online market available to us. 

Still using eBay and it&#039;s still producing good traffic, along with Amazon, our websites and shopping comparison sites we are in a strong position for the future. 

Quite why eBay don&#039;t want our money is for the board and the people who vote for them to sort out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be feeling it more than most Chris, low volume high value sales will be my downfall on eBay they don&#8217;t want our money or our products it seems.</p>
<p>Thankfully eBay&#8217;s biggest competitor in the UK market bit our hands off when we rang them so we now have a good spread of the online market available to us. </p>
<p>Still using eBay and it&#8217;s still producing good traffic, along with Amazon, our websites and shopping comparison sites we are in a strong position for the future. </p>
<p>Quite why eBay don&#8217;t want our money is for the board and the people who vote for them to sort out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34792</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34792</guid>
		<description>Most of you seem to be high volume seller so I don&#039;t think most of you are feeling the full impact of what has been done. I am currently selling a few items as I clear my house for sale. I had intended trying to build a business on ebay after I move. Now I&#039;m not sure that I can take the risk, when a couple of silly neutrals, which buyers have been educated to believe have no overall impact on feedback, could see me suspended and kicked of the site, when I am providing an excellent service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of you seem to be high volume seller so I don&#8217;t think most of you are feeling the full impact of what has been done. I am currently selling a few items as I clear my house for sale. I had intended trying to build a business on ebay after I move. Now I&#8217;m not sure that I can take the risk, when a couple of silly neutrals, which buyers have been educated to believe have no overall impact on feedback, could see me suspended and kicked of the site, when I am providing an excellent service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry007</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34791</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34791</guid>
		<description>Just another thing;

Why not an ebay forum or similar to score feedback for the delivery/courier companies we all have to use. PO can deliver 2nd class the next day &amp; yet 1st class can take 5-7 days in some cases. DHL pick up &amp; say 24 Hrs&#039; later the buyer gets the item, quite often this can be 3-5 days. So come on ebay start a reliability forum for the delivery companies. After all they are part of our dealings on ebay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another thing;</p>
<p>Why not an ebay forum or similar to score feedback for the delivery/courier companies we all have to use. PO can deliver 2nd class the next day &amp; yet 1st class can take 5-7 days in some cases. DHL pick up &amp; say 24 Hrs&#8217; later the buyer gets the item, quite often this can be 3-5 days. So come on ebay start a reliability forum for the delivery companies. After all they are part of our dealings on ebay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry007</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34790</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34790</guid>
		<description>All in all, it seems to have gone OK. 

Thankfully Ebay recalculated the multiple + feedbacks for everyone before changing the feedback calculations. So it seems although many have lost their 100%, many have gained extra feedback.

It still concerns us greatly what the future holds, with buyers being able to &#039;slag&#039; off a seller, &amp; the seller cannot then have the same right to reply. As we all know, there are some &#039;nutters&#039; out there, that because they spend say, 99p with you, think they own you forever.  

We are only a small seller on ebay &amp; obviously like all do not like bad comments in feedback, particularly when they are not true.
Ebay fail to assist with feedback withdrawal. We have just spent Â£15 with square trades to resolve a -, and the buyer would not even participate.

Ebays&#039; fees are OK generally, as most will agree, BUT our bottom line is &#039;are we making money out of this&#039;. If we have to start empolying more man hours sorting out problems (like items delayed in the Post.....Not an uncommon event!!!)
&amp; buyer get the hump, because we posted the item &amp; the PO delayed delivery.... what can we do......NOT A LOT NOW!!!!!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in all, it seems to have gone OK. </p>
<p>Thankfully Ebay recalculated the multiple + feedbacks for everyone before changing the feedback calculations. So it seems although many have lost their 100%, many have gained extra feedback.</p>
<p>It still concerns us greatly what the future holds, with buyers being able to &#8217;slag&#8217; off a seller, &amp; the seller cannot then have the same right to reply. As we all know, there are some &#8216;nutters&#8217; out there, that because they spend say, 99p with you, think they own you forever.  </p>
<p>We are only a small seller on ebay &amp; obviously like all do not like bad comments in feedback, particularly when they are not true.<br />
Ebay fail to assist with feedback withdrawal. We have just spent Â£15 with square trades to resolve a -, and the buyer would not even participate.</p>
<p>Ebays&#8217; fees are OK generally, as most will agree, BUT our bottom line is &#8216;are we making money out of this&#8217;. If we have to start empolying more man hours sorting out problems (like items delayed in the Post&#8230;..Not an uncommon event!!!)<br />
&amp; buyer get the hump, because we posted the item &amp; the PO delayed delivery&#8230;. what can we do&#8230;&#8230;NOT A LOT NOW!!!!!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34788</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34788</guid>
		<description>I think you have to look at the big picture...

Until now at least, many buyers have been reluctant to hand out negs and eBay want to make it easier to differentiate between good and bad sellers, so including neutrals adds to the desired effect...

Everything is relative so good sellers will still look good no matter what the percentage and I believe eBay will (as pinks have said) make adjustments as and when necessary in order to maintain their planned percentage of PS&#039;s &amp; discounts.

My main concerns for the future are...

1. Buyers not returning after leaving genuine negs or neutrals due to being hastled by indignant sellers.

2. NEW SEARCH!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have to look at the big picture&#8230;</p>
<p>Until now at least, many buyers have been reluctant to hand out negs and eBay want to make it easier to differentiate between good and bad sellers, so including neutrals adds to the desired effect&#8230;</p>
<p>Everything is relative so good sellers will still look good no matter what the percentage and I believe eBay will (as pinks have said) make adjustments as and when necessary in order to maintain their planned percentage of PS&#8217;s &amp; discounts.</p>
<p>My main concerns for the future are&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Buyers not returning after leaving genuine negs or neutrals due to being hastled by indignant sellers.</p>
<p>2. NEW SEARCH!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schuhstore</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34786</link>
		<dc:creator>schuhstore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 06:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34786</guid>
		<description>Our percentage dropped from 99.8 to 99.1, which is not to bad, but it does make us think that we have to re-think our selling strategy a bit more, to make sure we dont get any more avoidable neg/nut feedback...

On the repeat feedback credit...we were 120&#039;000 at 9am and by 5pm we were witting at just over 170&#039;000. So i think the extra 50&#039;000 is a small compensation for dropping a few points on our feedback score...we deserved the feedback credit, as we have a loyal customer base who we have service successfully on more than one occasion.

I think sellers just have to stop and take a minute to see what has happened, then re-think their strategies, whether its inventory or listings...and then make the improvements needed to add some points back onto their feedback scores! In all, i feel like others were saying, DSR&#039;s are more important that having a shooting star, but at the end of the day, if you drop below a % on your feedback, its game over!

Change is good...change is challenging...we like a change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our percentage dropped from 99.8 to 99.1, which is not to bad, but it does make us think that we have to re-think our selling strategy a bit more, to make sure we dont get any more avoidable neg/nut feedback&#8230;</p>
<p>On the repeat feedback credit&#8230;we were 120&#8242;000 at 9am and by 5pm we were witting at just over 170&#8242;000. So i think the extra 50&#8242;000 is a small compensation for dropping a few points on our feedback score&#8230;we deserved the feedback credit, as we have a loyal customer base who we have service successfully on more than one occasion.</p>
<p>I think sellers just have to stop and take a minute to see what has happened, then re-think their strategies, whether its inventory or listings&#8230;and then make the improvements needed to add some points back onto their feedback scores! In all, i feel like others were saying, DSR&#8217;s are more important that having a shooting star, but at the end of the day, if you drop below a % on your feedback, its game over!</p>
<p>Change is good&#8230;change is challenging&#8230;we like a change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: northumbrian</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34785</link>
		<dc:creator>northumbrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34785</guid>
		<description>we got another shooting star
 but so what
 shooting stars mean nowt these days 

and will ,mean even less in future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we got another shooting star<br />
 but so what<br />
 shooting stars mean nowt these days </p>
<p>and will ,mean even less in future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Classic</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34784</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Classic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34784</guid>
		<description>The neutrals were a mistake Dan.

Buyers do not know that leaving a neutral is leaving a neg.

This is a knife in the side for many sellers.

Communicating to the community is paramount.

Yet Ebay are communicating falsehoods to the community.

When the truth comes out, we are going to see feedback warfare from certain groups of buyers. They will revel in this activity and the complainers have been given free reign to ruin a sellers livelyhood.


Tis the nature of man.

We are all basically bad...



Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The neutrals were a mistake Dan.</p>
<p>Buyers do not know that leaving a neutral is leaving a neg.</p>
<p>This is a knife in the side for many sellers.</p>
<p>Communicating to the community is paramount.</p>
<p>Yet Ebay are communicating falsehoods to the community.</p>
<p>When the truth comes out, we are going to see feedback warfare from certain groups of buyers. They will revel in this activity and the complainers have been given free reign to ruin a sellers livelyhood.</p>
<p>Tis the nature of man.</p>
<p>We are all basically bad&#8230;</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan @ vzaar</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34783</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan @ vzaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34783</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I think we&#039;ll see about that. While I am certain all sellers will see  more negs and neuts, I&#039;m by no means as pessimistic as some.  It will be be interesting to visit these discussions in a year. :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ll see about that. While I am certain all sellers will see  more negs and neuts, I&#8217;m by no means as pessimistic as some.  It will be be interesting to visit these discussions in a year. <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Classic</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Classic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34782</guid>
		<description>I hate to point forwards folks, but those neutrals and negatives are very likely to start rolling in soon.

Especially with some of the encouragement to downgrade sellers that people are experiencing from Ebays new pop ups.

In six months from  now, I suspect a 98% will be very good...

Maybe even less.

We lost our 100% today after 5 years.

Sad to see it go.

But this is just the start, expect to see a steady decline in feedback when the buyers can leave negs with impunity...


I wonder how much support there will be then for these changes?

All you need is a few bad buyers in one month...


Then what happens?

I would not want to be trading in certain categories right now.



Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to point forwards folks, but those neutrals and negatives are very likely to start rolling in soon.</p>
<p>Especially with some of the encouragement to downgrade sellers that people are experiencing from Ebays new pop ups.</p>
<p>In six months from  now, I suspect a 98% will be very good&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe even less.</p>
<p>We lost our 100% today after 5 years.</p>
<p>Sad to see it go.</p>
<p>But this is just the start, expect to see a steady decline in feedback when the buyers can leave negs with impunity&#8230;</p>
<p>I wonder how much support there will be then for these changes?</p>
<p>All you need is a few bad buyers in one month&#8230;</p>
<p>Then what happens?</p>
<p>I would not want to be trading in certain categories right now.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan @ vzaar</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34780</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan @ vzaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34780</guid>
		<description>Percentage down a tiny bit...but that neg will expire soon, net feedback up. But annoyingly Jamie hit the grand before me....

I wonder what buyers who have been fastidious about only buying from 100% sellers will do now? ;O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Percentage down a tiny bit&#8230;but that neg will expire soon, net feedback up. But annoyingly Jamie hit the grand before me&#8230;.</p>
<p>I wonder what buyers who have been fastidious about only buying from 100% sellers will do now? ;O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Dawson</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34779</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34779</guid>
		<description>Ta Ed, I&#039;m a numpty  :oops:

Congratulations Lynne :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ta Ed, I&#8217;m a numpty  <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Congratulations Lynne <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://tamebay.com/2008/05/so-farewell-then-100-feedback.html#comment-34778</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamebay.com/?p=2728#comment-34778</guid>
		<description>Chris, you really should have gone to specsavers!!!  :smile: 

Josordoni  says earlier in the thread they got a shooter out of it.  :grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, you really should have gone to specsavers!!!  <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Josordoni  says earlier in the thread they got a shooter out of it.  <img src='http://tamebay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
