Multi-channel strategies for selling online

A report by JupiterResearch was released today which examines the issues driving multi-channel online selling. The report was commissioned by ChannelAdvisor. The highlight from the executive summary shows that 75% of online retailers surveyed attributed their online multi-channel strategy as a key contributing factor to their success.

Retailers claim that expansion of online channels are meeting their expectations for increased sales and new customer acquisitions. However retailers using multiple channels should be wary of the strain that running multiple channels places on the business processes.

This is something all those who started out selling on eBay should consider – whilst adding their own website, Amazon, Play.com and perhaps Google adwords and Comparison shopping might sound attractive, over-reaching and spreading your business too thinly across multiple channels may be detrimental to growth if introduced too early.

In order to mitigate the complexity of multiple online channel retailing, 55% of retailers outsource some aspects of the business operations. Almost 70% of those outsourcing attribute increased sales (and 65% increased customer acquisition) directly to their outsourced partners.

One of the most interesting parts of the report showed the percentage of total online sales attributed to the different online sources used.

Direct visits to websites, natural search and paid listings contributed almost three quarters of all online sales. Email marketing shouldn’t be underestimated, contributing 13% of online sales. It’s perhaps one of the lowest cost to implement (especially with shops email marketing tools on eBay). Comparison shopping in contrast was only thought to contribute 3% of sales but is used by 34% of retailers. This is one area the report falls down as it fails to explain why so many retailers use a channel for which so few sales are attributed.

In the UK, 50% of all online buyers use comparison shopping engines, but very few sales can be directly attributed to clicks on comparison shopping engines. This appears to be an anomaly, but in reality, what appears to happen, is that buyers make use of comparisons sites for researching a product prior to making the purchase.

Buyers may note your brand or company name on a comparison site, and then when they are ready to buy either use an Internet Search or simply type in your website URL to make the purchase. Whilst search or a direct visit to your website may be credited for the final sale, a comparison shopping engine could still have been a major influencer in the buyers decision on where to purchase. This is known as an “assist”.

The research is misleading in underestimating the importance of comparison shopping but this is an indicator that retailers are unable to fully track the influence and assist that different channels have on the final click. It’s just not credible for one in two UK buyers to use shopping comparison sites but for them to only generate 3% of sales.

There is a real need for online merchants to be able to track all clicks in the chain which generates a purchase, in order to strategically target advertising dollars. This is where third party outsourcing, to technology companies that can track all clicks from multiple channels leading up to the final purchase click, really pays off.

While the obstacles of both scale and technology need to be addressed the report leaves little doubt that utilizing multiple channels for online retailing is essential for long term success.